[April 2016 Submission] Leave No Trace
I have been visiting many state parks and wildlife areas in
Louisiana, and occasionally I’ve profiled a few of the more attractive hiking
and camping places in this journal. Our
state is fortunate to have these beautiful recreational sites for residents and
out-of-state visitors. Given state
budgetary challenges for the future, we have to be concerned, though, about the
maintenance or upkeep of these key resources.
Some state parks and recreational areas show a natural “wear
and tear” of continuing public usage in little or more significant ways. Other places stand out due to more recent
construction or refurbishment. For
example, Palmetto Island State Park, about ten miles south of Abbeville, appears
particularly well maintained and is a joy to visit.
I can remember even as a boy the differences that I observed
in the hunting, fishing, and other recreational practices of friends. Some seemed appreciative and respectful of
our forests, lakes, and wildlife areas, while others took much less care and even
“trashed” sites in certain ways. I
believe, in general, and over decades, that people are becoming more respectful
toward wildlife resources. Still, there
are increasing human demands on our national and state public lands, and some
folks just don’t care that much or don’t know better. Practices such as leaving food containers,
picking certain wildflowers, or letting a dog run free in a sensitive wildlife
habitat can have unforeseen and unintended consequences. Education concerning the natural environment
in our schools certainly helps, as well as peer pressure and reactions from
those observing improper outdoor behavior.
Fulfilling outdoor training and educational goals is the
purpose of the Center for Outdoor Ethics and its “Leave No Trace” programs. This national non-profit organization, started
in the 1960s and based in Boulder, Colorado, sends teams to various locations
as trainers and consultants. On a
first-ever “hot spot” trip for the organization to the state of Louisiana in
November, Leave No Trace trainers, Katelyn
Stutterheim and Blake Jackson, spent a number of days meeting in the
Lafayette area with students, the public, and wildlife professionals. Bayou
Teche and Bayou Vermilion resource development and preservation officials
helped spark this “hot spot” visit. It
was the last hot spot of the year chosen by Leave No Trace trainers to visit, with 16
different spots in the USA picked for its educational programs in 2106.
These LNT trainers always emphasize the organization’s seven
principles of outdoor ethics. The first
is the importance of planning and preparation for outdoor and wildlife
trips. Mistakes, accidents, and
littering often occur when humans are not prepared for the conditions that they
actually encounter. The second
principle of Leave No Trace is to travel and camp on more durable surfaces
where possible to reduce soil erosion and damage to sensitive areas. The third principle is to dispose of
waste in a proper manner. If you pack
stuff in, be sure to pack it out. Better
means to dispose of human excretory waste is a topic that some outdoor
enthusiasts have not really considered.
A fourth principle is leaving what you find in parks and wildlife
areas to allow others the beauty and discoveries that you experienced.
Smoky the Bear may have long trumpeted their fifth principle
of minimizing campfire impacts, but more detailed examples, options, and
precautions are part of what training experts can teach even experienced
campers. The sixth principle is
as important as any. Respecting wildlife
means a knowledge and sensitivity of human impact, and minimizing these impacts
when possible. Consideration toward
other visitors to parks and wildlife areas is a last principle, and this
includes courteous sharing of trails and other resources, as well as limiting
loud sounds or noises. For example, on
multi-use trails, both bikers and hikers should yield to horseback riders,
while bikers should yield to hikers.
None of these seven principles might seem to go beyond what
should pass as common sense, but actual practices in specific situations that
more fully support these principles seem the real value of Leave No Trace
training. Previous focus by park and
wildlife officials was usually on warning signs or slogans, enforcement efforts, and penalties. More recent priorities have been placed on explaining
to the public the “whys” or reasoning associated with rules or regulations. When the public understands better the potentially
negative consequences and costs associated with infractions, their
environmental IQ rises beyond just better rule acceptance.
I have to admit that in several cases I had not really
recognized possible consequences associated with certain of my own common
outdoor practices. Effective trainers can
offer research studies and cases showing how certain habits can be less than beneficial,
yet can be modified to reduce their potential adverse consequences. These trainers also have skill in gaining the
active involvement of training audiences, often children and adolescents, by
asking them first to handle actual situations and make own choices.
Much more information on wildlife ethics, conservation, and
training opportunities can be found on the Center for Outdoor Ethics and Leave
No Trace web site (www.LNT.org). Membership in the organization and
contributions for its educational mission are certainly welcomed.